You have to be interested in inequality. The issue of inequality and that of poverty are not separable.
Opponents of globalisation may see it as a new folly, but it is neither particularly new, nor, in general, a folly.
Resenting the obtuseness of others is not good ground for shooting oneself in the foot.
No democracy with a free press has ever experienced a major famine.
I'm generally in favor of economic globalization. Having said that, it doesnt always work and does not immediately work in the interest of all. There are sufferers.
But the idea that I should be a teacher and a researcher of some sort did not vary over the years.
There is considerable evidence that women's education and literacy tend to reduce the mortality rates of children
Poverty is not really as much of an obstacle to educational expansion as it's sometimes made out to be.
There are few subjects that match the social significance of women's education in the contemporary world.
It is important to reclaim for humanity the ground that has been taken from it by various arbitrarily narrow formulations of the demands of rationality
Globalization has enriched the world scientifically and culturally and benefited many people economically as well.
Anything that increases the voice of young women tends therefore to reduce the fertility rate.
Democracy is a universal value
A defeated argument that refuses to be obliterated can remain very alive.
Violence is fomented by the imposition of singular and belligerent identities on gullible people, championed by proficient artisans of terror.
There are Muslims of all kinds. The idea of closing them into a single identity is wrong.
No substantial famine has ever occurred in a democratic country - no matter how poor.
the identity of an individual is essentially a function of her choices, rather than the discovery of an immutable attribute
While I am interested both in economics and in philosophy, the union of my interests in the two fields far exceeds their intersection.